Editorial policy

Facts first, interpretation second.

We write for readers who need to decide whether Grok, SuperGrok, X Premium, or another AI subscription is worth their time and money.

Bylines and review

Articles list Vikas Dulgunde as the editor and show update dates when changing product information is reviewed. Vikas is a software engineer with 6 years of experience, which informs the site's review of product surfaces, developer docs, subscription paths, and AI comparison claims. Source links, dates, and image credits are checked before a page is updated.

Independence

Coverage is written for readers, not for xAI, X, Grok, Elon Musk, or any AI vendor. Recommendations must explain the reader context and the source evidence behind the conclusion.

Updates

Material changes get updated dates. If a change affects a recommendation or pricing explanation, the relevant article is updated with the clearest available source.

Corrections

Readers can report factual issues through the contact page. A useful report includes the page URL, the exact claim, and the source that should be checked. Corrections may update a sentence, clarify a date, change a recommendation, or add a source note.

Images

Images are selected to support the article topic. Official screenshots are used for identification and commentary. Custom editorial images are used when they make a reader task clearer without pretending to be an official product screenshot.

Comparison pages

Comparison pages should explain how to compare, not only which product sounds strongest. They should include reader workflows, source checks, practical examples, and reasons a different answer may fit a different person.

Page purpose

Every public page should answer a clear reader question. Hubs help readers choose the right guide, trust pages explain how the publication works, and resource pages make source checking easier.

Privacy options